Aunque no hay documentación con respecto a mi respuesta en ninguna parte, después de una experimentación exhaustiva, he llegado a la conclusión más lógica:
La presencia del operador '+' anula cualquier efecto del operador '~'
He actualizado mi tabla fruits
con los siguientes valores -
SELECT * FROM fruits;
+----+-------------------------+
| id | name |
+----+-------------------------+
| 1 | apple orange watermelon |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate |
| 3 | apple mango banana |
| 4 | mango kiwi pomegranate |
| 5 | mango guava watermelon |
| 6 | apple banana kiwi |
+----+-------------------------+
Consulta 1:
SELECT id, name FROM fruits
-> WHERE MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('apple mango ~pomegranate'
-> IN BOOLEAN MODE);
+----+-------------------------+
| id | name |
+----+-------------------------+
| 3 | apple mango banana |
| 1 | apple orange watermelon |
| 5 | mango guava watermelon |
| 6 | apple banana kiwi |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate |
| 4 | mango kiwi pomegranate |
+----+-------------------------+
Consulta 2:
SELECT id, name FROM fruits
-> WHERE MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('apple ~pomegranate'
-> IN BOOLEAN MODE);
+----+-------------------------+
| id | name |
+----+-------------------------+
| 1 | apple orange watermelon |
| 3 | apple mango banana |
| 6 | apple banana kiwi |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate |
+----+-------------------------+
Consulta 3:
SELECT id, name FROM fruits
-> WHERE MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('mango ~pomegranate'
-> IN BOOLEAN MODE);
+----+-------------------------+
| id | name |
+----+-------------------------+
| 3 | apple mango banana |
| 5 | mango guava watermelon |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate |
| 4 | mango kiwi pomegranate |
+----+-------------------------+
Aquí, en las consultas 1, 2 y 3 ningún operador precede a los valores apple
y mango
y ~
el operador precede al valor pomegranate
. Esto asegura que las filas que tienen la palabra pomegranate
están clasificados más abajo que otros.
Consulta 4:
SELECT id, name FROM fruits
-> WHERE MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('+apple +mango ~pomegranate'
-> IN BOOLEAN MODE);
+----+-------------------------+
| id | name |
+----+-------------------------+
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate |
| 3 | apple mango banana |
+----+-------------------------+
Consulta 5:
SELECT id, name FROM fruits
-> WHERE MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('+apple ~pomegranate'
-> IN BOOLEAN MODE);
+----+-------------------------+
| id | name |
+----+-------------------------+
| 1 | apple orange watermelon |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate |
| 3 | apple mango banana |
| 6 | apple banana kiwi |
+----+-------------------------+
Consulta 6:
SELECT id, name FROM fruits
-> WHERE MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('+mango ~pomegranate'
-> IN BOOLEAN MODE);
+----+-------------------------+
| id | name |
+----+-------------------------+
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate |
| 3 | apple mango banana |
| 4 | mango kiwi pomegranate |
| 5 | mango guava watermelon |
+----+-------------------------+
Aquí, en las consultas 4, 5 y 6 +
el operador precede a los valores apple
y mango
y ~
el operador precede al valor pomegranate
. Claramente la presencia de +
operador anula cualquier efecto de ~
operador.
Consulta 7:
SELECT id, name FROM fruits
-> WHERE MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('+apple +mango <pomegranate'
-> IN BOOLEAN MODE);
+----+-------------------------+
| id | name |
+----+-------------------------+
| 3 | apple mango banana |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate |
+----+-------------------------+
Consulta 8:
SELECT id, name FROM fruits
-> WHERE MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('+apple <pomegranate'
-> IN BOOLEAN MODE);
+----+-------------------------+
| id | name |
+----+-------------------------+
| 1 | apple orange watermelon |
| 3 | apple mango banana |
| 6 | apple banana kiwi |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate |
+----+-------------------------+
Consulta 9:
SELECT id, name FROM fruits
-> WHERE MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('+mango <pomegranate'
-> IN BOOLEAN MODE);
+----+-------------------------+
| id | name |
+----+-------------------------+
| 3 | apple mango banana |
| 5 | mango guava watermelon |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate |
| 4 | mango kiwi pomegranate |
+----+-------------------------+
Aquí, en las consultas 7, 8 y 9 +
el operador precede a los valores apple
y mango
y <
el operador precede al valor pomegranate
. Esto asegura que las filas que tienen la palabra pomegranate
están clasificados más abajo que otros.
Por lo tanto, lo que se puede deducir de aquí es que -if +
el operador está presente, use <
operador en lugar de ~
operador
ACTUALIZAR
Después de un cálculo extenso, he creado la tabla fruits_score_count
que muestra la score
de cada fruit
cuando se hace la búsqueda booleana de TEXTO COMPLETO.
SELECT * FROM fruits_score_count;
+----+-------------+---------------------+----------------------+
| id | fruit_name | row_numbers_matched | score |
+----+-------------+---------------------+----------------------+
| 1 | apple | 4 | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 2 | banana | 2 | 0.22764469683170319 |
| 3 | guava | 1 | 0.6055193543434143 |
| 4 | kiwi | 2 | 0.22764469683170319 |
| 5 | mango | 4 | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 6 | orange | 1 | 0.6055193543434143 |
| 7 | pomegranate | 2 | 0.22764469683170319 |
| 8 | watermelon | 2 | 0.22764469683170319 |
+----+-------------+---------------------+----------------------+
Consulta 1:
SELECT id, name, score FROM
-> (SELECT id, name, MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('apple mango ~pomegranate' IN BOOLEAN MODE)
-> AS score FROM fruits ORDER BY score DESC)
-> AS temp WHERE score != 0;
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| id | name | score |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| 3 | apple mango banana | 0.062016263604164124 |
| 1 | apple orange watermelon | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 5 | mango guava watermelon | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 6 | apple banana kiwi | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate | -0.7103390693664551 |
| 4 | mango kiwi pomegranate | -0.7413471937179565 |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
Consulta 2:
SELECT id, name, score FROM
-> (SELECT id, name, MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('apple ~pomegranate' IN BOOLEAN MODE)
-> AS score FROM fruits ORDER BY score DESC)
-> AS temp WHERE score != 0;
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| id | name | score |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| 1 | apple orange watermelon | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 3 | apple mango banana | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 6 | apple banana kiwi | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate | -0.7413471937179565 |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
Consulta 3:
SELECT id, name, score FROM
-> (SELECT id, name, MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('mango ~pomegranate' IN BOOLEAN MODE)
-> AS score FROM fruits ORDER BY score DESC)
-> AS temp WHERE score != 0;
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| id | name | score |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| 3 | apple mango banana | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 5 | mango guava watermelon | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate | -0.7413471937179565 |
| 4 | mango kiwi pomegranate | -0.7413471937179565 |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
Consulta 4:
SELECT id, name, score FROM
-> (SELECT id, name, MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('+apple +mango ~pomegranate' IN BOOLEAN MODE)
-> AS score FROM fruits ORDER BY score DESC)
-> AS temp WHERE score != 0;
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| id | name | score |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate | 0.062016263604164124 |
| 3 | apple mango banana | 0.062016263604164124 |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
Consulta 5:
SELECT id, name, score FROM
-> (SELECT id, name, MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('+apple ~pomegranate' IN BOOLEAN MODE)
-> AS score FROM fruits ORDER BY score DESC)
-> AS temp WHERE score != 0;
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| id | name | score |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| 1 | apple orange watermelon | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 3 | apple mango banana | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 6 | apple banana kiwi | 0.031008131802082062 |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
Consulta 6:
SELECT id, name, score FROM
-> (SELECT id, name, MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('+mango ~pomegranate' IN BOOLEAN MODE)
-> AS score FROM fruits ORDER BY score DESC)
-> AS temp WHERE score != 0;
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| id | name | score |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 3 | apple mango banana | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 4 | mango kiwi pomegranate | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 5 | mango guava watermelon | 0.031008131802082062 |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
Consulta 7:
SELECT id, name, score FROM
-> (SELECT id, name, MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('+apple +mango <pomegranate' IN BOOLEAN MODE)
-> AS score FROM fruits ORDER BY score DESC)
-> AS temp WHERE score != 0;
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| id | name | score |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| 3 | apple mango banana | 0.062016263604164124 |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate | -0.7103390693664551 |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
Consulta 8:
SELECT id, name, score FROM
-> (SELECT id, name, MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('+apple <pomegranate' IN BOOLEAN MODE)
-> AS score FROM fruits ORDER BY score DESC)
-> AS temp WHERE score != 0;
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| id | name | score |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| 1 | apple orange watermelon | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 3 | apple mango banana | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 6 | apple banana kiwi | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate | -0.7413471937179565 |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
Consulta 9:
SELECT id, name, score FROM
-> (SELECT id, name, MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('+mango <pomegranate' IN BOOLEAN MODE)
-> AS score FROM fruits ORDER BY score DESC)
-> AS temp WHERE score != 0;
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| id | name | score |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| 3 | apple mango banana | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 5 | mango guava watermelon | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate | -0.7413471937179565 |
| 4 | mango kiwi pomegranate | -0.7413471937179565 |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
Aquí, Consulta 1, Consulta 2, Consulta 3, Consulta 7, Consulta 8, Consulta 9 se comporta como se esperaba.
Pero de Consulta 4, Consulta 5, Consulta 6 está claro que -
En presencia de +
operador que precede a un valor con el ~
El operador básicamente hace que el valor sea invisible.
También la observación cuidadosa revela que -
x ~y
y +x <y
son equivalentes
MÁS EXPERIMENTACIÓN
Consulta 1:
SELECT id, name, score FROM
-> (SELECT id, name, MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('+mango apple ~pomegranate' IN BOOLEAN MODE)
-> AS score FROM fruits ORDER BY score DESC)
-> AS temp WHERE score != 0;
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| id | name | score |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| 3 | apple mango banana | 0.062016263604164124 |
| 4 | mango kiwi pomegranate | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 5 | mango guava watermelon | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate | -0.7103390693664551 |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
- Fila 1 con
id = 3
obtiene la puntuación máxima, que es la suma de las puntuaciones demango
yapple
. - Fila 2 con
id = 4
obtiene la segunda puntuación máxima, que es la puntuación demango
. Presencia de+
operador delante demango
hace~pomegranate
de la frase de búsqueda irrelevante. - Fila 3 con
id = 5
obtiene la misma puntuación que la Fila 2. Pero se coloca más abajo que la Fila 2 porque cuando las puntuaciones son las mismas, las filas se clasifican en orden creciente deprimary key
, aquíid
esprimary key
. - Fila 4 con
id = 2
obtiene la puntuación más baja y, por lo tanto, ocupa el último lugar. Aquí desde la palabraapple
está presente y en la frase de búsqueda no hay+
operador que precede aapple
, por lo tanto~pomegranate
en la frase de búsqueda se tiene en cuenta, lo que reduce significativamente la puntuación.
Consulta 2:
SELECT id, name, score FROM
-> (SELECT id, name, MATCH(name) AGAINST
-> ('+mango apple <pomegranate' IN BOOLEAN MODE)
-> AS score FROM fruits ORDER BY score DESC)
-> AS temp WHERE score != 0;
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| id | name | score |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
| 3 | apple mango banana | 0.062016263604164124 |
| 5 | mango guava watermelon | 0.031008131802082062 |
| 2 | apple mango pomegranate | -0.7103390693664551 |
| 4 | mango kiwi pomegranate | -0.7413471937179565 |
+----+-------------------------+----------------------+
Esto nuevamente ilustra que <
el operador surte efecto incluso en presencia de +
operador.
Esto refuerza aún más mi observación anterior de que -
si +
el operador está presente, use <
operador en lugar de ~
operador